No spoonful of sugar required for sweet Mary Poppins sequel Return of magical nanny matches its practically perfect predecessor
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Monthly Digital Subscription
$19 $0 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*No charge for four weeks then billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Offer only available to new and qualified returning subscribers. Cancel any time.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 18/12/2018 (2200 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
Those who grew up with the 1964 movie Mary Poppins may be at a disadvantage when it comes to realizing how very unusual it was for a kids’ movie.
First and foremost, it was a full-blown musical, using the talents of Broadway vets Julie Andrews (My Fair Lady, Camelot) and Dick Van Dyke (Bye Bye Birdie). Second, in the nascent years of psychedelia, it had a decidedly hallucinogenic flavour, with whole sequences putting live actors in animated settings and acting opposite cartoons (now standing operating procedure in visual effects-driven films).
Most challenging of all, perhaps, was the character of Mary herself. A magical nanny, Mary arrived at the home of the Banks family to sort out the tangled tensions of the household. Wise, mysterious, mystical and possibly ancient, she often speaks in Zen koans. (”Open different doors. You may find a you there that you never knew was yours.”) She is also “practically perfect in every way,” meaning she is a character without an arc: she is the exact same person at the end of an adventure that she was at the beginning. Julie Andrews won an Oscar for her performance anyway, on the strength of formidable song-and-dance skills and her stoic embrace of the madness of it all.
In that spirit, director Rob Marshall (Chicago; Into the Woods) embraces the madness of doing a sequel 54 years after the first film. In Mary Poppins Returns, the Banks children are all grown up. Michael (Ben Whishaw) is struggling to raise his three rambunctious children after the death of his wife. His supportive sister Jane (Emily Mortimer), following in the tracks of her suffragette mother, is a labour activist.
The bank where Michael works — the same bank where his father toiled — is threatening to foreclose on the family home as the distraught Michael has missed payments. He could use a little magic. And though he attributes his childhood adventures with Mary (an unflappable Emily Blunt assumes the role) as a flight of juvenile fancy, he assents to putting his kids under her care after she descends from the sky, still her favourite mode of travel.
Lamplighter Jack (Lin-Manuel Miranda, the creator-star of Hamilton) serving as the proxy of Van Dyke’s chimney sweep character Bert, accompanies Mary and the kids on their adventures, which include a visit to a cartoon English music hall. Interestingly, the kids’ cartoon adventures mirror the realities they will face in the real world. (In a way, Mary Poppins Returns is like a Disneyfied version of Carlos Castaneda’s guided peyote-flown adventures with Yaqui shaman Don Juan.)
Marshall captures the English-eccentric spirit of the original, and the former Broadway choreographer is well-suited to stage the musical sequences with lively energy. He is at a disadvantage in that none of the movie’s songs are as infectious as the original Sherman brothers-penned ditties.
Having conquered Broadway, Miranda proves a good match for the film medium; he is a magnetic presence, and if he can’t quite match Van Dyke’s goofy charm, he’s a lot more successful with the English accent.
By contrast, Blunt matches Andrews quite successfully in playing Mary. The character still doesn’t have a discernible arc, but Blunt succeeds in finding her own shadings to the character, particularly in the gleeful wickedness of Mary’s wit.
Blunt is, in the end, perfect enough.
randall.king@freepress.mb.ca
Twitter: @FreepKing
MOVIE REVIEW
Mary Poppins Returns
Starring Emily Blunt, Lin-Manuel Miranda and Ben Whishaw
Grant Park, Kildonan Place, McGillivray, Polo Park, St. Vital, Towne.
G
131 minutes
★★★ 1/2 stars out of five
Other voices
It all just feels incredibly effortful, not effervescent and light.
—Katie Walsh, Tribune News Service
Mary Poppins Returns might have had a chance had the movie not tried to compete with the original in terms of scale. With 20 minutes of song and dance numbers cut, the movie really could have been better – not great, but better.
— Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle
It’s not just Blunt that’s at the top of her game in this thoroughly delightful enterprise by director Rob Marshall and a crack team of artists devoted to both honouring a time-worn classic and finding something new to say. The visuals are lovely [too].
— Jocelyn Noveck, The Associated Press
If I don’t say it, another critic will: Mary Poppins Returns really is practically perfect in every way.
— Robbie Collin, Daily Telegraph
Spoonfuls of sugar always help the movie magic go down; if only this Mary had gotten a necessary twist of lemon, too.
— Leah Greenblatt, Entertainment Weekly
Randall King
Reporter
In a way, Randall King was born into the entertainment beat.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.