Children’s Advocate Act gets nod from PCs, but faces time crunch
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Monthly Digital Subscription
$19 $0 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*No charge for 4 weeks then billed as $19 every four weeks (new subscribers and qualified returning subscribers only). Cancel anytime.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 02/12/2015 (3269 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
A bill that would broaden the mandate of the Office of the Children’s Advocate got a qualified thumbs-up from the Progressive Conservative Opposition as it was introduced on Thursday, but the Selinger government still faces an uphill battle getting it approved before the spring election.
PC Family Services critic Ian Wishart said the government’s second attempt at expanding the role of the advocate — as recommended nearly two years ago by a public inquiry — is a much better effort.
“I am encouraged by what I see. I’m looking forward to the (public) hearings on this one,” he said.
But with only three weeks left in the session (Feb. 24-March 15), there’s not a lot of time for MLAs to do their due diligence in examining a complex bill, Wishart said.
As reported previously by the Free Press, Bill 16 (The Children’s Advocate Act) would increase the independence of the children’s advocate’s office, allowing it to investigate a greater range of serious incidents involving children.
With its passage, the advocate would be able to probe serious injuries as well as child deaths, and the scope of the investigations would not be limited to child and family services. They would also extend to children’s dealings with the justice and health systems.
Furthermore, the advocate would have greater discretion in making its findings public.
The expanded role of the Office of the Children’s Advocate was recommended by retired justice Ted Hughes nearly two years ago in his report into the death of Phoenix Sinclair, a child who was murdered while in care of CFS.
In late spring, the Selinger government introduced an earlier version of the bill, which was generally panned as inadequate. By early September, Family Services Minister Kerri Irvin-Ross took the unusual step of withdrawing the first bill and announcing it would be replaced by a more comprehensive measure.
But the timeline for getting it passed before the April 19 election is tight, and Irvin-Ross knows it.
She said her department will brief the Opposition on the bill on Friday.
Irvin-Ross said Thursday the government always intended to expand the role of the children’s advocate as Hughes recommended, and the first bill was always considered a first step in the process.
But she said the government found after further discussions — both internally and with outside agencies — that it could move more quickly than it initially thought.
“It was a lot of work (within) the department, amongst the authorities and the agencies and the children’s advocate herself,” Irvin-Ross said of the legislation introduced Thursday.
Larry Kusch
Legislature reporter
Larry Kusch didn’t know what he wanted to do with his life until he attended a high school newspaper editor’s workshop in Regina in the summer of 1969 and listened to a university student speak glowingly about the journalism program at Carleton University in Ottawa.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.