Manitobans split on allowing civil disobedience

By: Sarah Lawrynuik Posted: 4:23 PM CDT Monday, May. 11, 2020

More than half of Manitobans polled indicated they favour police using "whatever legal force is required" to end disruptive displays of civil disobedience, such as February's rail blockades in support of the Wet'suwet'en hereditary chiefs' opposition to the Coastal GasLink pipeline through unceded territory.

Read this article for free:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

*No charge for 4 weeks then billed as $19 every four weeks (new subscribers and qualified returning subscribers only). Cancel anytime.

Read unlimited articles for free today:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 10/05/2020 (1644 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

More than half of Manitobans polled indicated they favour police using “whatever legal force is required” to end disruptive displays of civil disobedience, such as February’s rail blockades in support of the Wet’suwet’en hereditary chiefs’ opposition to the Coastal GasLink pipeline through unceded territory.

The survey was conducted by Probe Research and polled 1,000 Manitobans on the issue between March 10 and 24.

Among those who supported police intervention in these displays of civil disobedience, rural Manitobans were more likely to be in favour of intervention, as were men, those who had lower levels of formal education and there was also a sharp political divide — supporters of the provincial Progressive Conservative Party are twice as likely as supporters of the New Democrats or Liberals to be in favour of having blockades removed by police.

Rail blockades near Belleville, Ont., Feb. 24: A poll suggests more than half of Manitobans favour letting police use whatever force is necessary to end disruptive forms of protests. (Lars Hagberg / The Canadian Press files)

“We expected there would be some difference but not that stark,” said Curtis Brown, principal with Probe Research.

While 87 per cent of respondents said that picketing in front of the legislature was an acceptable form of protest, that acceptance dropped to 40 per cent of respondents approving of protesters blocking critical infrastructure for a matter of hours, and if the timeline expanded support dropped even further (26 per cent). Protesting outside of a politician’s home was only seen as an acceptable form of protest by three in 10 people, only one in 10 supported protest in the form of spray painting public buildings or statues.

“I think in many ways, it does show that people are OK with (civil disobedience) as long as it doesn’t inconvenience them too much,” Brown said. “It was certainly a hot-button topic at the time, and COVID certainly eclipsed it, but I think — as a society — we’re going to be grappling with these sorts of questions for a long time.”

sarah.lawrynuik@freepress.mb.ca