Riders with disabilities deserve better transit

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 12/04/2019 (2121 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Is it time to stop contracting out Transit Plus?

For years, an open secret in Winnipeg has been the poor quality of service associated with Transit Plus (previously Handi-Transit), which exists to provide a parallel Winnipeg Transit for those with disabilities.

The service provides transportation for approximately 7,500 people a year. Due to problems with the services, the Independent Living Resource Centre (ILRC) was able to, with the assistance of the Public Interest Law Centre, submit a complaint to the Manitoba ombudsman.

In January, the ombudsman’s report on Transit Plus was released, and it publicly highlighted numerous issues that users and advocates of the system had been raising for years. The report made 19 recommendations that addressed many concerns brought forth by the ILRC.

The recommendations include making a process for complaints and appeals publicly available, a review to clarify eligibility criteria and removing the Transit Plus manager from the appeals process.

As well, Transit Plus should be working to clarify its “no show” policy, which has caused major headaches for users.

The ombudsman also recommended that the sexual harassment policy, which had shockingly been removed from the driver’s manual, be restored.

Additionally, the ombudsman recommended that Transit Plus “review its functionality and impact to ensure it reflects reasonably equivalent service to the fixed-route transit system.”

This recommendation tells us what we really need to know: Transit Plus is not living up to its mission to provide an alternative service for those who rely on it. With so many problems arising from the way this service is being delivered, city hall must ask whether it is worth bringing Transit Plus back in-house and offering it as a public service. This is a timely consideration, given that the Transit Service Master Plan is being created and due to be released in August.

At the heart of the perils facing Transit Plus, and one not addressed by the ombudsman, is the fact that Transit Plus service is contracted out instead of being provided as a public service.

As noted in the report, as of December 2017, there were seven private contractors providing services under 15 separate contracts. Some contractors attempt to cut costs by paying their workers minimum wage while not investing in proper infrastructure or training. For example, the report noted that prospective Transit Plus operators — those who drive the cars and vans — are responsible for paying for their own training. This is in contrast to bus operators who, once hired, are provided comprehensive training as part of their employment.

It’s time the City of Winnipeg considers operating Transit Plus in-house as a public service, not as a for-profit enterprise for private business. People living with disabilities use public services and benefit when the services are of good quality, as opposed to ones that are poorly delivered by the private sector. People with disabilities deserve service at a comparable level. This is a human rights issue that must be addressed by the City of Winnipeg.

In the most recent edition of the Winnipeg Alternative Budget published by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives — Manitoba, and in the 2018 State of the Inner City report “Green Light Go: Improving Transportation Equity,” one of the important calls was to bring Transit Plus back in-house, operated by the public sector.

It is when city hall acts on this critically important issue that we will see an improvement in the services provided to people living with disabilities.

Carlos Sosa is a member of the Board of Inclusion Winnipeg, a past co-chairperson of the Manitoba League of Persons with Disabilities and a research affiliate with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Contributions to this article came from Zach Fleisher, director of communications at the Amalgamated Transit Union 1505, and Sara Atnikov, who worked for the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives — Manitoba.